Catherine of Aragon and the King’s Great Matter

Today, 480 years ago, the Archbishop of Canterbury Thomas Cranmer annulled the marriage of Henry VIII and his first wife, Catherine of Aragon.

Catherine was an incredible woman. She was the daughter of the King Ferdinand of Aragon and Queen Isabella of Castille, the monarchs who finally united Spain. (They also commissioned Columbus to explore the New World.)

She left Spain and at the age of 16, she married Prince Arthur, the heir to the English throne. A year and a month later, he was dead. For the next seven years, Catherine was a pawn between her father – who wanted her dowry back – and her father-in-law, you wanted to keep it. Neither, it seems were concerned about her well-being.

In 1509, King Henry VII died and was succeeded by his second son Henry VIII. He quickly married Catherine, and for many years, they were very happy. Catherine was a very compassionate and intelligent woman. She was beloved in England for extensive charitable work, and was friends with the leading Renaissance humanists of the time like Desiderius Erasmus and Thomas More. In fact, Catherine helped to set the fashion for educating women.

Michael Sittow, Young Catherine of Aragon, c. 1504 (Kunsthistorisches Museum, Vienna)

Michael Sittow, Young Catherine of Aragon, c. 1504 (Kunsthistorisches Museum, Vienna)

She was also just kick-arse awesome. In 1513, when Henry was away fighting in France, the Scots invaded. Catherine summoned the English army and even rode some of the way north with them in full armor. The English ended up decimating the Scots at the Battle of Flodden Field, where King James IV of the Scots was killed – the last British monarch to die in battle.

Catherine and Henry had at least six children: three sons, one who died at 2 months, and two of whom lived for only a few hours, and three daughters, one who miscarried, one who lived for almost a week, and Mary. Mary was Catherine and Henry’s only surviving child and Henry was desperate for a male heir.

At some point, he decided that his lack of a son was a punishment from God for marrying his brother’s widow, contrary to Leviticus 19. They had received a papal dispensation because usually, such marriages were not allowed under canon law. In this case, however, Catherine had not consummated her first marriage so it wasn’t deemed valid.

That was not good enough for Henry though. At the same time, he was also falling in love with one of Catherine’s ladies in waiting, Anne Boleyn. He requested an annulment from the pope but was denied. It was suggested that Catherine quickly “retire” into a convent but she wouldn’t have any of it. So in 1530, Henry banished Catherine and moved Anne into her rooms. Anne became his wife in all but name, but still, Catherine refused to cave.

Eventually, Henry took matters into his own hands. In May 1533, Thomas Cranmer, one of Henry’s supporters, annulled the marriage. Laws were passed so that all the clergy had to recognise the King as Supreme Head of the Church of England, including his right to make and break Canon Law (i.e. the laws of the Church.)

Five days later, Henry married Anne and she was crowned Queen by Cranmer. Catherine refused to accept the “marriage” or Henry’s title of “Supreme Head”. She kept deferentially – but defiantly – calling him her “lord husband”, and said that she was willing to anything to please him… so long as it was pleasing to God.

The English people supported her, and they hated Anne. Her staunchest supporters though were St Thomas More and St John Fisher. Both were martyred in 1535 for refusing to acknowledge Henry as the Supreme Head.

Catherine died one year later in January 1536.

Henry and Anne celebrated her death gleefully but by that time, Henry and Anne’s own marriage was precarious. Anne miscarried on the same day Catherine was buried at Peterborough Abbey and in May that same year, Henry had her executed for treason. Her crime was failing to give Henry the son he wanted.

And within days Henry married his third wife, Jane Seymour… And then his fourth, Anne of Cleves. And then his fifth, Catherine Howard. And finally his sixth, Catherine Parr. (To remember what happened to them, just remember divorced, beheaded, died, divorced, beheaded, survived.)

7e8fca5b012cf37e8266607980c00d57

To me, Catherine of Aragon is a hero and something of a martyr. She stayed true to her marriage vows and to her faith, even when the easiest thing in the world would have been to go quietly. Catherine may not be an official saint of the Church, but she is a hero of the faith and a particularly relevant one today. At a time like this, the beautiful sacrament of marriage is also under attack. People want to make it what they want, whether it’s about divorce, homosexuality or believing that it doesn’t matter at all.

These days, many Christians are also being pressured to cave on marriage, toe the party line and not upset the “kings” of our own age.

Catherine was in incredibly strong woman, and even Thomas Cromwell who arranged the annulment said that “if not for her sex, she could have defied all the heroes of History.” I think she did something far harder. She defied the man who was her husband and her king, who had the power to lock her up, take her child from her, label her a liar, and deny their 24 years of marriage – all of which he did.

Her motto was “humble and loyal”, and by God, she was – through all that Henry put her through.

That makes her a hero in my eyes.

Advertisements

11 responses to “Catherine of Aragon and the King’s Great Matter

  1. Coming from a Mennonite background, I can’t help but see the main issue as one of church and state. When a head of state declares himself head of the church (and for such transparently selfish reasons, no less), he’s creating all kinds of problems.

    • Exactly! I hadn’t thought about it before but both Catholics and Mennonites are very suspicious of “state” churches. Though they have a different take on the solution! Thanks for the insightful comment! 🙂

  2. OK. This has nothing to do with the current post. I thought I read a post of yours “the judge and a sacred little girl”. I can’t find it but it really touched me. I’d like to post a link for a song with two of my favorite artists, Amy Grant and James Taylor both of whom battled depression. Hope you will listen, I find it beautiful! 🙂
    http://www.godtube.com/watch/?v=WKPLY7NX

  3. Great post! I must, however, pick one small nit. While you are probably correct in saying that the marriage between Catherine and Arthur was never consumated, this does not make it invalid. Consumation is required to make a marriage indissoluble, not for validity, otherwise the marriage of Our Lady and St. Joseph would have been invalid.

    the reason the Pope could give the proper dispensation is that, under the new covenant, the law forbidding marriage to the widow of one’s brother is ecceliastic law, not divine law and can thus be dispensed from. Even had the first marriage been consumated, the second would still have been valid.

    • Thank you! I don’t think that’s nitpicking, it’s an important point, and very good to know! Thank you again. 🙂

  4. Pingback: Women of the Gobi and the Son of God | CATHOLIC CRAVINGS·

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s